Pluralism vs. Monism

Pluralism holds that the universe consists of discrete, self-contained entities, each possessing its own independent essence. Monism, by contrast, maintains that what appear to be separate elements are in fact interconnected expressions of a single, unified reality grounded in an underlying coherence. Where pluralism foregrounds diversity and differentiation, monism emphasizes unity and interdependence. These opposing metaphysical views reflect broader intellectual traditions: pluralism aligns with the atomistic, analytical orientation of Western thought, while monism resonates with the holistic, integrative philosophies long cultivated in the East.

At the social and political level, pluralism champions individual distinction, self-determination, personal liberty, individual rights, private ownership, competition, and free-market economics. Monism, on the other hand, conceives of individuals as interrelated members of a larger social organism, prioritizing communal interests, cooperation, equality, fraternity, social responsibility, and collective well-being. These philosophical paradigms have profoundly shaped economic systems, political institutions, and social values across civilizations. The central question, however, remains unresolved: which worldview better serves humanity’s long-term interests and leads toward a sustainable and flourishing future?

Aristotle famously observed that “the whole is greater than the sum of its parts.” For much of human history, monistic thinking prevailed, as early societies intuitively understood that unity and cooperation were essential for survival. With the rise of modern science, technology, and industrialization, individuals gained unprecedented autonomy, fostering self-reliance and accelerating a shift toward individualism and pluralism. These developments elevated personal liberty and diversity, contributing to the emergence of multiculturalism and the embrace of nonconformity, including LGBTQ+ rights, same-sex marriage, and other iconoclastic values. At the same time, these trends have been accompanied by broader philosophical shifts: relativism, which blurs distinctions between truth and falsehood, right and wrong, or beauty and ugliness; skepticism toward intellectual authority, reason, and even science; and policy frameworks such as affirmative action aimed at redressing historical inequities. While these developments have expanded inclusion and stimulated creativity, they have also intensified social fragmentation, eroded shared moral standards, and fueled ideological polarization, partisan conflict, and civic decline (see Tango and Individualism).

Rooted in a Darwinian logic of competition and survival of the fittest, individualism and pluralism often neglect the values of equality, morality, and the common good. The result has been growing social instability—not only within societies that champion these ideologies but also globally. This is evident in the moral decay, political dysfunction, and rising lawlessness within the United States, the erosion of integrity among its political elites, and the destabilizing effects of its hegemonic and coercive foreign policies abroad (see Darwinism and Confucianism).

At their core, these ideologies overlook a fundamental truth: human beings are inherently interconnected and interdependent. Our survival and progress depend on solidarity and cooperation. A healthy society must be grounded in philosophies that cultivate cohesion, shared moral principles, social stability, and effective governance. When individuals are set against one another in relentless pursuit of personal gain, division and hostility inevitably follow.

This pattern is evident in the aftermath of many U.S.-led interventions carried out in the name of “liberation,” which have frequently produced domestic instability, humanitarian crises, and mass displacement. These consequences are further compounded by open-border policies and the growing challenges of multicultural integration at home. If radical liberalism continues to advance—privileging absolute personal freedom over collective responsibility, rejecting all authority as oppressive, framing democracy as “the tyranny of the majority,” intensifying gender antagonisms, politicizing education, media, and law, and fragmenting society into ever-narrower identity groups—the social fabric will continue to unravel.

To be clear, liberalism has historically played a vital role in unlocking human potential and enabling capitalism’s rise in the West. Yet its excessive emphasis on individualism has increasingly become counterproductive. As one perceptive reader noted: “Freedom and human rights movements have placed an intensified focus on individuality. This inflated sense of self diminishes our ability to perceive the world as a unified whole and may underlie many modern psychological struggles—loneliness, depression, and mental distress. If we can zoom out and recognize ourselves as small parts of a vast universe, a fact unchanged since the Big Bang, we may rediscover the beauty of ancient natural laws and adopt a healthier perspective on ourselves and the world” (see A Wise Voice).

Although freedom is a legitimate human aspiration, radical liberalism has paradoxically resulted in the reconcentration of wealth, resources, and political power in the hands of a few—no longer under monarchies or aristocracies, but under the guise of free competition.

Observing the West’s historical success, the East—while remaining rooted in holistic philosophy and Confucian ethics—has increasingly encouraged human initiative and creativity, producing remarkable gains in recent decades. While the East has selectively integrated Western strengths, the West has largely refused to learn from the East, clinging to the belief that its past success validates its ideological supremacy. Rather than confronting its structural and moral contradictions, it has doubled down on neoliberalism. Enormous resources are devoted to media propaganda, NGOs, military expansion, and cognitive, trade, technological, and financial warfare to preserve its system and impose its values globally. This reaction is understandable given that capitalism has a vested interest in sustaining these ideologies—without them, plutocracy risks losing its legitimacy (see Democracy vs. Plutocracy).

Yet the global balance of power is shifting. While the pluralistic West once held clear advantages, the monistic East—having integrated Western strengths—has rapidly closed the gap and, in many areas, surpassed it. Individuality and sociality are both intrinsic dimensions of human nature and must be held in balance. Neither authoritarianism, which suppresses individual freedom, nor individualism, which denies humanity’s shared destiny and interdependence, can sustain a cohesive society. A successful society is built on fraternity, solidarity, cooperation, and a willingness to subordinate narrow self-interest to collective purpose. This is how families function (see Tango and Family Values). This is how tango is danced. This is how China has grown strong. And this is how America can regain its strength.

In this context, tango offers a powerful counterpoint to modern individualism. It reminds us that we are not isolated actors but participants in an intimate, responsive human partnership. Through its emphasis on mutual accommodation, trust, and cooperation, tango reveals a profound truth: genuine progress arises not from competition, but from collaboration. In this sense, tango confirms that equality, cooperation, mutual benefit, and sharing are not merely aesthetic ideals, but the true foundations of a better world (see Philosophies that Separate Two Worlds).

Champaign Milongueros Group Charter

Champaign Milongueros is a group of tango students who regularly meet here to study and dance the milonguero style of tango.

Our mission is to bring together like-minded local tango dancers, promote the milonguero style of tango, and foster a culture of fraternity, solidarity, cooperation, and community within the group.

We adhere to the tango protocols observed in the milongas of Buenos Aires, including personal hygiene, dress code, separate seating, cabeceo, navigation rules, and milonga etiquette. (See Milonga Codes.)

A rotating leadership team is responsible for recruitment, training, events, and liaison.

This group is open only to committed tango enthusiasts who want tango to be an integral part of their lifestyle, not to casual dancers.

The terms for joining this group are as follows:

1. Dedication to the milonguero style of tango.

2. Commitment to regular and long-term participation.

3. In addition to attending classes and dancing at this location, members take turns to host a biweekly group event, such as a potluck, picnic, hiking trip, seminar, tea party, sports activity, or milonga, at a separate time and location of their choice. These activities aim to build friendships and encourage team collaboration.

4. Applicants for membership must complete our training to attend our milongas.

Tango Music and Its Danceability

One

Tango music is written in 4/4 time, meaning each measure contains four quarter notes, counted as 1, 2, 3, 4. The first and third beats are strong, typically where we step. The second and fourth beats are weak and are often used for ancillary movements such as crossing, weight changes, hip rotations, pivots, or embellishments.

Each quarter note can be evenly divided into two eighth notes, counted as 1-and, 2-and, 3-and, 4-and—resulting in eight eighth notes per measure. Further subdivision produces sixteenth notes, counted as 1-e-and-a, 2-e-and-a, 3-e-and-a, 4-e-and-a, creating a total of sixteen sixteenth notes per measure.

The ability to divide the notes and predict where the subdivisions fall is important, as it expands the dancer’s range of possible movements. Feeling rhythm is an internal process. The rhythm must exist in mind before it can manifest in movements. Rhythm is the most fundamental element of music. It can exist even in the absence of melody, as seen in the drumbeats of early or primitive music. At its essence, dance is the body's natural response to rhythm. We instinctively move to the beat because those accents provide structure, guiding and enhancing our movements. Without rhythm, dance cannot exist.

However, feeling rhythm becomes more challenging when syncopation is introduced. Syncopation is the way musicians add complexity to music by shifting, splitting, adding, or omitting beats. Examples include emphasizing even-numbered beats (1, 2, 3, 4), extending a beat (1 - - -), starting a note on an unaccented beat and continuing it through the next accented beat (1, 2 -, 4), splitting a note into subdivisions (1-and, 2-and, 3-and, 4-and), accenting subdivisions (1-and, 2-and, 3-and, 4-and), adding unexpected accents (1, 2, 3, 4), or omitting notes and replacing them with rests. While syncopation makes the rhythm more dynamic and expressive, it also demands more from the dancer’s sense of timing and awareness, making the music harder to follow.

Nevertheless, dancers welcome this challenge. As long as the music adheres to its time signature—allowing it to be consistently counted as 1, 2, 3, 4 throughout—it remains danceable. In fact, the most satisfying songs to dance to are not monotonous or overly simple, but rather feature intricate rhythms layered over a steady, predictable beat. This balance between complexity and danceability is a hallmark of classic tango (see The Characteristics of Classic Tango.)

Two

This began to change when musicians started experimenting with innovative concepts such as improvisation, counterpoint, cross-rhythms, polyrhythms, compound and asymmetrical rhythms, complex harmonies, and odd-numbered meters where notes are grouped unevenly (e.g., 5/4 and 7/8 time). They also began blending duple, triple, and quadruple time signatures; layering distinct rhythms across instruments; and combining instrumental and vocal lines with divergent rhythmic structures. While these techniques are undeniably creative, they often produce rhythms that are too intricate for dancing—one of the defining features of modern music.

It's important to note that classic music is still being composed today, meaning not all music created in contemporary times qualifies as "modern." What distinguishes modern music is the incorporation of unconventional elements. While there are certainly gray areas, modern compositions consistently include at least some nontraditional aspects that render the rhythm—or parts of it—irregular, unrecognizable, unpredictable, and, consequently, undanceable.

Some argue that all music is danceable, but this isn't quite true. Perhaps anything that can be followed using two legs qualifies in the broadest sense, but fingers can move far faster than legs. An orchestra, effectively made up of dozens—or even hundreds—of fingers, can produce music of immense complexity, especially when the goal is listening rather than dancing.

For music to be truly danceable, it must offer clear, predictable, and physically followable beats. Dance is the body’s natural response to rhythm. We are drawn to rhythm because it echo recurring patterns in our lives—heartbeat, biological clock, or muscle memory of rhythmic actions like walking, facilitating our movement. Millions of years of evolution have ingrained rhythm as an aesthetic and musical pleasure, making our bodies instinctively react to rhythmic sounds.

While highly trained professionals might be able to memorize and move to irregular or unpredictable rhythms, this is not feasible for the average dancer. DJs must remember that the music they play at milongas is meant for social tango dancing—by and for ordinary dancers—not as a platform for a handful of elite performers to showcase their skills. A good DJ must prioritize the needs of the majority and resist the pressure exerted by a select few. (As a DJ myself, I am all too familiar with such pressures.)

Three

The shift in modern music is not coincidental. We live in a culture where rampant liberalism and individualism drive many to pursue uniqueness at any cost, while profit-driven commercialism relentlessly pushes for innovation, repackaging, novelty, exoticism, and boldness to boost sales. Innovation, while beneficial, also brings unintended consequences. Every time I purchase a smartphone, a newer and smarter version is released the following week. Economists call this "creating demand"—a strategy that persuades consumers to discard perfectly functional products for the latest model, resulting in tremendous waste, as illustrated in this documentary. People raised in this culture often lack depth and enduring quality. They confuse novelty with beauty, favor spectacle over substance, and constantly seek change. The following reader's comment reflects this mindset:

“Most of us did not start doing the tango in order to get the ocho just right. Most of us saw elegant, dramatic, and erotic moves in a performance that took our breath away. Then we take tango lessons and dance among older people who look down their noses at beginners for not doing the details as well as they can, who are quite conservative in their tastes, who are uptight about the eroticism, who are offended when attractive young people look better at the erotic movements than they do, and who are too weak, inflexible, heavy, and cowardly to do the more dramatic moves... The idea of dividing tango into social dance and 'show' dance trivializes efforts to be more creative and to actually do the dance that we were attracted to in the first place. Performance is not just for tourists. It includes ballet, modern dance, jazz, and other rich, culturally important forms. It can be brilliant and revolutionary, changing the way we think. It can give tango dance its Isadora Duncans, Sergei Diaghilevs, Merce Cunninghams, and Astor Piazzollas. Tango and dance have always included a conversation between performance and social dance. Both should be respected as spaces where creativity can thrive. That's how art and culture evolve in living ways.”

While I won’t explore here why the milonga is not the place for performance (see Social Tango and Performance Tango), I do want to address the role of creativity. No doubt, creativity has transformed our lives. However, despite its many contributions, we must not overlook its dark side. Human creativity is a double-edged sword. It has given us automobiles, computers, GPS, and beautiful, danceable music like classic tango—but it has also brought us weapons of mass destruction, addictive substances, high-tech crime, and unlistenable noise. Creativity can improve life when wielded with wisdom, but it can also destroy life when pursued recklessly in the name of novelty, ignoring the forces beyond human control that govern our existence—whether you call them the Cosmos, Nature, Law, Tao, or God.

Already, human ingenuity has caused enormous harm: irreversible damage to our planet, pollution, climate change, environmental catastrophes, resource depletion, ecosystem collapse, chemical, biological, and nuclear threats, countless deaths caused by inventions such as guns, drugs, automobiles, man-made viruses, modern warfare, and the polarization and dysfunction of governments fueled by our “creative” politicians.

This obsession with novelty also drives many DJs to make their music selections unconventional. They curate music that is obscure, exotic, or difficult to dance to, prioritizing their personal brand over the dancer’s experience. They embrace modernism and dismiss the classics, despite the fact that classics are time-tested masterpieces, embodying what generations of dancers have deemed beautiful and danceable. They fail to recognize that, 60 years after the Golden Age, tango dancers still cherish classic tango music, while the “revolutionary” music of the same era has long been forgotten. They overlook the reality that every generation produces both enduring classics and fleeting rubbish. They fail to understand that creativity must serve humanity’s best interests, needs, and aesthetics to have lasting value. In dance, this means prioritizing danceability over outlandishness. Although they may love music and have extensive collections, they often lack an understanding of what makes music danceable. Worst of all, they tend to play unfamiliar, erratic, and undanceable tracks at milongas simply because the danceable ones are traditional.

Dancers are not opposed to innovation. On the contrary, creativity is at the heart of how we express ourselves on the dance floor. We welcome fresh challenges that enrich our dancing. But we also expect music that we can dance to. We want our DJs to prioritize danceability, to listen to every song from beginning to end and ensure it’s fully danceable before playing it at a milonga. And we want them to serve the broader social dancing community—not just a few elites or eccentric individuals. (See My Two Cents on Music Selection.)

Dancing to Melody – Poema

Stepping to the beat is a basic component of musicality, but it lacks nuance and sophistication. Beats are rhythmic pulses that define tempo—they are discrete, mechanical, and emotionally neutral. Stepping on the beat is like jumping: it emphasizes accents with vertical, fragmented, and percussive movement.

The soul of dance lies not in the beat, but in the emotion of the music—and that emotion lives in the melody. Melody is continuous, lyrical, and expressive. It carries the sentiment, beauty, and fluidity of the music. To dance to the melody is to glide, not strike—to flow, not punctuate. The result is smooth, horizontal, uninterrupted movement that unfolds with grace and even pacing.

Dancers can choose to follow either the beat or the melody, each offering a distinct style.

When we dance to the beat, we wait for it and step on it with emphasis, producing sharp, disconnected, and punctuated movements. Consider the following example.

The tango Poema, like many classics, is infused with nostalgia and melancholy. As Enrique Santos Discépolo famously said, “Tango is a sad feeling that is danced.” The lyrics were written by Eduardo Bianco, who once played first violin at the Teatro Apolo in 1927. His life took a dramatic turn when he discovered his wife’s affair with the orchestra’s pianist. In a fit of passion and despair, he shot his rival. The lyrics of Poema reflect his sorrow, heartbreak, and regret. Below is an English translation by Alberto Paz:

                        It was a dream of sweet love,
                        hours of happiness and loving,
                        it was the poem of yesterday,
                        that I dreamed,
                        of gilded color,
                        vain chimeras of the heart,
                        it will not manage to never decipher,
                        so fleeting nest,
                        it was a dream of love and adoration.

                        When the flowers of your rose garden,
                        bloom again ever so beautiful,
                        you'll remember my love,
                        and you will come to know,
                        all my intense misfortune.

                        Of that once-intoxicating poem,
                        nothing remains between us,
                        I say my sorrowful goodbye,
                        you'll feel the emotion,
                        of my pain…

The music was composed by Mario Melfi in 1932 and arranged by Francisco Canaro in 1935. In Canaro’s version, only the final two stanzas are sung, performed by Roberto Maida.

When dancing to Poema, immerse yourself in the lyricist’s anguish—as if you, too, are saying a final, heart-wrenching goodbye to a lost love. While you must still be aware of the beat, do not let it dictate abrupt or fragmented steps. Let the melody lead. Move fluidly, keeping your pace even and continuous. Here's an example.

Notice how this couple is not chasing the beat. Instead, they dance slowly, their movements simple, soft, and melodious—filled with the sorrow of parting, perfectly matching the melancholy mood of the music (see The Elegance of the Milonguero Style).

I often find that when I seek to express the melody, my partner still instinctively focuses on the beat. Since most dancers are trained to step on the beat, this is understandable. However, to convey the emotion of Poema, the focus must shift to the melody. The key lies in controlling your movement—ensuring each step is smooth and continuous, never abrupt or disjointed. This is especially crucial for women, who embody the melodic and feminine essence of tango, shaping its fluidity and emotional depth (see The Characteristics of Classic Tango).